Bill to replace CJI

News

The Union government introduced The Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Bill, 2023, removing the Chief Justice of India (CJI) from a panel to select the Chief Election Commissioner and Election Commissioners.

Instead of the CJI, the three-member panel would now consist of a:

  1. Cabinet minister
  2. Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha
  3. Prime Minister as the head of committee.
About:

The Supreme Court had ruled that the selection panel should comprise the:

  1. Prime Minister,
  2. The Leader of Opposition (LoP) in Lok Sabha
  3. CJI

The court had said the order would hold good until a law was made by Parliament.

Till the SC ruling, Election Commissioners and Chief Election Commissioners (CECs) had been appointed by the President after recommendations by the government.

 

About: Independence of Judiciary

The Independence of the Election Commission of India (ECI) is a crucial aspect of ensuring the fairness, transparency, and integrity of the electoral process in India.

The ECI is responsible for conducting free and fair elections at various levels of government, including the Lok Sabha (House of the People), State Legislative Assemblies.

Its independence is essential to prevent any undue influence or interference in the electoral process. Here's how the independence of the Election Commission is maintained:

 

Constitutional Status: The ECI is established under Article 324 of the Indian Constitution. It is a constitutional body that operates independently of the executive and legislative branches of the government.

Security of Tenure: The Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and Election Commissioners have fixed tenures and can only be removed in a manner and on grounds similar to that of a judge of the Supreme Court. This ensures their independence from political pressures.

Financial Autonomy: The ECI is financially autonomous. Its budget is charged on the Consolidated Fund of India, which means it doesn't need to seek funds from the government during its functioning. This prevents financial dependence on the executive branch.

Non-Interference in Election Process: The government is bound to consult the Election Commission on matters relating to the conduct of elections, but it is not bound by its advice. This allows the Election Commission to function independently and take decisions without undue pressure.

Wide Powers: The Election Commission has the power to take decisions on various aspects of the election process, including delimitation of constituencies, voter registration, code of conduct for political parties, and election-related disputes. These powers are crucial for conducting fair elections without external influence.

Model Code of Conduct: The Election Commission enforces the Model Code of Conduct during elections, which political parties and candidates must adhere to. This ensures that the electoral process remains fair and free from any attempts to influence voters through unfair means.

Supervision of Media Coverage: The ECI monitors media coverage during elections to ensure that all parties receive equitable coverage. This prevents media bias and manipulation that could favour certain parties or candidates.

Accountability and Transparency: The Election Commission is accountable for its actions and decisions. It publishes guidelines, rules, and regulations, and its decisions are subject to judicial review, which promotes transparency and fairness.

Election Commission's Autonomy: The ECI operates independently of the government's day-to-day functioning. It is not subject to control or influence by the government in matters related to election management.

Public Trust: The Election Commission's credibility and reputation for impartiality are essential to maintain public trust in the electoral process. Any perception of bias or lack of independence can undermine the public's confidence in the democratic system.

 

Despite these safeguards, challenges to the independence of the Election Commission can arise, and maintaining its autonomy requires continuous vigilance and commitment to democratic principles.

Issues in Independence of Election Commission of India

The independence of the Election Commission of India (ECI) is crucial for ensuring free, fair, and transparent elections in the country. However, like any institution, the ECI can face challenges that may impact its independence. Some of the issues that affect the independence of the Election Commission of India include:

Political Influence: The potential for political interference is a significant concern. If the ruling government or political parties attempt to influence the decision-making of the Election Commission, it can undermine the neutrality and impartiality of the electoral process.

Appointments and Appointing Authority: The process of appointing the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and Election Commissioners can raise concerns if it lacks transparency or is perceived to be influenced by the ruling party. A transparent and merit-based appointment process is essential to maintain the independence of the ECI.

Removal and Tenure: The removal process and tenure of Election Commissioners can impact their ability to make impartial decisions. If there is a lack of security in tenure or a removal process that is susceptible to political pressures, it can compromise the independence of the commissioners.

Resource Dependence: The Election Commission's financial and administrative autonomy is crucial for its independence. If it is dependent on the government for funding or resources, it could potentially be influenced by the government's priorities.

Enforcement Powers: The ECI's effectiveness depends on its enforcement powers. If it lacks the authority to enforce its decisions, such as imposing penalties on political parties for violating election rules, its decisions may not have the desired impact.

Media and Public Perception: The perception of the ECI's independence matters. If the media or the public believes that the Election Commission is not acting impartially, it can lead to a loss of confidence in the electoral process.

 

Lack of Legal Teeth: In some cases, the Election Commission might lack the necessary legal authority to address emerging challenges in the electoral process. This can hinder its ability to adapt to changing circumstances and maintain its independence.

Election Disputes and Legal Challenges: Election-related disputes and legal challenges can sometimes put pressure on the ECI. If the process of resolving disputes is not perceived as fair and transparent, it can raise questions about the integrity of the election.

Code of Conduct: While the ECI enforces the Model Code of Conduct, its effectiveness can vary. If there is non-compliance or lack of accountability for violations, it can undermine the level playing field for all political parties.

Technology and Data Security: As elections increasingly rely on technology and data management, issues related to cybersecurity and data privacy can impact the integrity of the electoral process. Ensuring secure and transparent use of technology is vital for maintaining public trust.

 

To address these challenges and uphold the independence of the Election Commission of India, it's essential to have strong legal safeguards, transparent processes, clear guidelines, and a commitment from all stakeholders to respect the institution's autonomy and impartiality.




Posted by on 11th Aug 2023